Know the Law. Win More Cases.
Publisher: Monty A. McIntyre, Esq.
California Case Summaries™ is the fast and easy way to always know the new civil cases in your practice areas to get a competitive advantage and win more cases. By consistently reading new published cases, civil attorneys will significantly improve their legal knowledge, skills and overall effectiveness as advocates.
Every year California courts publish about 500 new civil cases, and many of them significantly change the law! You could spend tons of time (and lose lots of billable hours) each month trying to keep up with the new cases.
Or, you can quickly and easily keep up with the new cases with California Case Summaries™ which provides unique one-paragraph summaries, organized by legal topic, of every new civil case published by California courts. Subscribers get monthly issues with Westlaw case citations, quarterly issues with the official case citations, and an annual issue in early January each year with the official case citations.
California Case Summaries™ costs less than one billable hour per month.
Individual attorney and Law Firm Unlimited Multi-user subscriptions are available.
30-Day Money Back Guarantee: Subscribe with no risk. If you're not satisfied for any reason, let us know and your money will be refunded, no questions asked.
Subscribe today to get your competitive advantage and win more cases!
CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL
Are simultaneous alternative CCP 998 offers valid?
Civil Procedure
Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (2024) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2024 WL 4456864: In this important new case dealing with CCP 998 offers, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s order holding that because defendant had sent one valid CCP 998 offer that plaintiff rejected, and plaintiff failed to get a more favorable result at trial, plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees were limited and defendant was awarded its post-offer costs. The twist in this case was that defendant made two simultaneous 998 offers that it labeled as “alternative offers.” After plaintiff leased a lease a new 2016 Land Rover LR4 from defendant, he experienced numerous defects and nonconformities that defendant was unable to repair. Plaintiff sued defendant in a lemon law case under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) and alleged (1) breach of express warranty, (2) breach of implied warranty, and (3) breach of the duty to return the vehicle from service without defects within 30 days. Defendant sent two simultaneous 998 offers. One was a lump sum offer, offering to pay plaintiff $85,000.00 to return the vehicle with free and clear title. There was no dispute that this was a valid CCP 998 offer. The other offer was a category-based offer with a dispute resolution mechanism where defendant agreed to pay undisputed damages and allowed plaintiff to pick a dispute resolution process to resolve disputed damages. For both alternative offers defendant offered to pay plaintiff’s attorney fees and costs in either (1) a flat amount of $7,500 or (2) an amount to be determined by the court. The Court of Appeal concluded that simultaneous offers to the same party are not effective under CCP 998 because such offers do not allow the trial court to determine whether the judgement is more favorable than the offer. The Court of Appeal also concluded that category-based offer was invalid. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that when an offeree makes two simultaneous offers, one of which is invalid and the other valid, this does not make the independently valid offer ineffective. The trial court properly evaluated the valid 998 offer and concluded that plaintiff was limited to recovering his pre-offer costs and attorney fees and was required to pay defendant’s post-offer costs. (C.A. 2nd, October 10, 2024.)
We offer a 30-Day Money Back Guarantee. If you don't like California Case Summaries™, for any reason, just let us know within 30 days and we'll refund your money, no questions asked.
PER MONTH
Includes:
ANNUALLY (SAVE $389!)
Includes:
Law firms can distribute case summaries to every lawyer and paralegal in the firm at a substantial savings compared to buying individual subscriptions.
PER MONTH
Includes:
PER YEAR (SAVE $989!)
Includes:
"Your summaries are great because they get to the point. You know your audience. I don’t want to read a whole bunch of shit. Just get me to the point. "
"For California civil practitioners having trouble keeping up on the latest cases, California Case Summaries™ is must reading. Monty has a great command of the law and is able to summarize these cases succinctly and clearly. Monty is San Diego's Bernie Witkin. "
"I really appreciate the case summaries. Saves me time and makes me look smart. A double bonus. "
"California Case Summaries™ is an indispensable tool for lawyers in every specialty and practice area. Monty's case summaries are concise explanations that puts each opinion in context."
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.