Know The Law. Win More Cases.
CA lawyers who know the new cases in their practice areas get a competitive advantage to win more cases.
However, it's hard to know the new cases because California courts publish about 500 new civil cases each year and many of them significantly change the law!
California Case Summaries™ is the perfect solution. It provides unique one-paragraph case summaries, organized by legal topic, of every new civil case published by California courts throughout each year. Subscribers get monthly issues with Westlaw case citations, quarterly issues with the official case citations, and an annual issue in early January each year with the official case citations.
Subscribers always easily know the new case law in their practice areas and get a competitive advantage to win more cases.
Individual and Law Firm Unlimited Multi-user subscriptions are available.
CALIFORNIA COURTS OF APPEAL
How much detail about other aggrieved employees must a PAGA plaintiff include in the prelitigation notice?
Employment
Ibarra v. Chuy & Sons Labor, Inc. (2024) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2024 WL 3037693: The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings in plaintiff’s action alleging a Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) on behalf of herself and other and all current and former non-exempt aggrieved employees of defendants in the State of California. The trial court granted the motion for judgment on the pleadings, concluding that plaintiff’s prelitigation notice to her employers and the Labor Workforce and Development Agency was deficient under Labor Code section 2699.3 because it did not clearly define the aggrieved employees. The Court of Appeal disagreed, concluding that nothing in the plain text of section 2699.3 expressly required a PAGA plaintiff to define aggrieved employees in the prelitigation notice, and it declined to read a requirement into the PAGA statute that did not appear therein. So long as the PAGA plaintiff provides facts and theories to support that alleged wage and hour violations were committed against them and includes nonfrivolous allegations that other employees were similarly subjected to such practices, the notice is sufficient. (C.A. 2nd, June 18, 2024.)
We offer a 30-Day Money Back Guarantee. If you don't like California Case Summaries™, for any reason, just let us know within 30 days and we'll refund your money, no questions asked.
PER MONTH
Includes:
ANNUALLY (SAVE $389!)
Includes:
These subscriptions allow law firms to distribute case summaries to every lawyer and paralegal in the firm.
PER MONTH
Includes:
PER YEAR (SAVE $989!)
Includes:
"Your summaries are great because they get to the point. You know your audience. I don’t want to read a whole bunch of shit. Just get me to the point. "
"For California civil practitioners having trouble keeping up on the latest cases, California Case Summaries™ is must reading. Monty has a great command of the law and is able to summarize these cases succinctly and clearly. Monty is San Diego's Bernie Witkin. "
"I really appreciate the case summaries. Saves me time and makes me look smart. A double bonus. "
"California Case Summaries™ is an indispensable tool for lawyers in every specialty and practice area. Monty's case summaries are concise explanations that puts each opinion in context."
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.