New CA Elder Abuse Case

 
  • Want to Easily Keep Up With New CA Civil Cases in Your Practice Areas?
  • Want to Save Time, Win More & Make More Money?
I can help! Since 2012, I've helped many California lawyers save time and easily keep up with the new case law in their practice areas to win more and make more money by publishing California Case Summaries™ with short summaries (one paragraph), organized by legal topic, of every new CA civil case published in monthly, quarterly and annual subscription editions.
 
My publications are only available to a limited number of subscribers, 
giving them a competitive advantage. They are periodically opened to new subscribers. 
 
Join Our Email List: To get my free summaries of the 22 new civil cases published by the California Supreme Court in 2021click here. 

Elder Abuse

In a Financial Elder Abuse action, last month the First District Court of Appeal addressed the issues of whether the plaintiff can obtain a pretrial right to attach order, and what amounts can be covered by such an order. A video discussing the case is above and my summary of the case is below.

New Elder Abuse Decision  

Royals v. Lu (2022) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2022 WL 2800956: The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's order granting plaintiff's request for a pretrial right to attach order (RTAO) in the sum of $3,440,000 against defendant under section 15657.01 of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (the Elder Abuse Act; Welfare & Institutions Code, section 15600 et. seq.) After plaintiff filed her petition, defendant filed a cross-petition. Both made competing claims of Elder Abuse against the other. A financial elder abuse claimant may obtain an attachment for potential compensatory damages and an award of attorney fees and costs associated with those damages, but only if the request for it complies with all applicable provisions of the statutory scheme governing pretrial attachments (the Attachment Law; Code of Civil Procedure, section 481.010 et. seq.). The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court, concluding that defendant's attachment application did not comply with four provisions of the Attachment Law. It was not (i) supported by competent evidence (id., section 482.040), (ii) did not on an attachable "amount" (id., section 484.020(b)), (iii) was not based on a claim upon which an attachment may be issued (id., section 484.020(a)), and (iv) was not measured by the defendant's claimed "indebtedness" to the plaintiff (id., section 483.015(a)(1)). Ruling on an issue of first impression, the Court of Appeal held that potential punitive damages and statutory penalties in a financial elder abuse claim may not be secured by the extraordinary remedy of a pretrial attachment. (C.A. 1st, July 18, 2022.)

California Case Summary™ Publications

California Case Summaries Monthly™:  short summaries (one paragraph), organized by legal topic, of every new civil case published by California courts every month. This subscription is currently open for a short time. To subscribe, click here.

California Case Summaries Quarterly™: short, organized summaries of every new civil case, published by California courts every quarter, with the official case citations. This subscription is currently open for a short time. To subscribe,
click here.

Annual Practice Area Case Summaries™: Early every January, we publish Annual Practice Area case summaries for the practice areas of Employment, Real Property and Torts with short, organized summaries of every new civil case in each practice area (plus additional important legal topics), with the official case citations. 

California Case Summaries Annual™: Published early every January, with short, organized summaries of every new civil case published the year before, with the official case citations.  

Join Our Email List: To get my free summaries of the 22 new civil cases published by the California Supreme Court in 2021, click here.


Mediation, Arbitration and Referee Services

I help attorneys and their clients as a mediator, arbitrator and referee with ADR Services, Inc., handling cases in the areas of business, employment, insurance bad faith, insurance coverage, legal malpractice, medical malpractice, personal injury, real property and wrongful death. I conduct Zoom hearings throughout California and also in-person services. When you need a neutral who knows CA law, to schedule a matter please contact my case manager at ADR services, Haward Cho, [email protected], (213) 683-1600.  
 

Stay safe and healthy.

Best regards,
Monty A. McIntyre, Esq.
California Case Summaries™
Mediator, Arbitrator & Referee
Lawyer Master Mentoring™

CA Civil Trial Attorney Since 1980
ABOTA Member Since 1995
Past President San Diego County Bar Assn., SD ABOTA Chapter
Phone: (619) 990-4312.
Email: [email protected] 

Get Your Competitive Advantage. Subscribe Today to California Case Summaries

Click Here to Subscribe Today
Close

50% Complete

Two Step

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.