New Civil Procedure and Employment Case

 
  • Easily Keep Up With New Civil Cases. Save Time, Win More & Make More Money
Since 2012, I've helped California lawyers save time and easily keep up with the new case law to win more and make more money with my publication California Case Summaries™. I prepare short summaries (one-paragraph), organized by legal topic, of every new published CA civil case in monthly, quarterly and annual subscription editions. My publications are only available to a limited number of subscribers, giving them a competitive advantage. They are periodically opened to new subscribers. 
 
Join Our Email List: To get my free summaries of the 22 new civil cases published by the California Supreme Court in 2021, click here. 

Civil Procedure and Employment

The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing can file an action on behalf of an employee. Last month, the Sixth District Court of Appeal published a decision addressing the issue of whether am action filed on behalf of an employee could proceed using a fictitious name because revealing the employee's identity could jeopardize the safety of his family members in India. A video discussing the case is above and my summary of the case is below.

New Civil Procedure and Employment Decision  

Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (2022) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2022 WL 3136002: The Court of Appeal granted a writ petition directing the trial court to vacate its order denying plaintiff's motion to proceed using a fictitious name and to reconsider the motion based on the views expressed in the Court of Appeal's opinion. Plaintiff asked that the real party in interest—the affected employee—be referred to as John Doe, in part because revealing his identity could jeopardize the safety of his family members in India. The trial court understood what interests it needed to balance. It considered the public's right to access court proceedings. It also considered whether an important interest would be prejudiced if the employee were required to publicly disclose his identity. But, the trial court erred when deciding whether an overriding interest justified anonymity because it expressly declined to consider the employee's concern about safety of family members in India. Retaliatory harm to family members—wherever they are located—is precisely the kind of interest that may justify allowing a party to litigate under a pseudonym. The fact that the family members were geographically distant did not render the concern irrelevant as a threshold matter. A party seeking anonymity has the burden to show that geographically distant family members are at risk. The trial court's task is to consider the evidence produced on that point and assign it the appropriate weight. (C.A. 6th, August 5, 2022.) 


 California Case Summary™ Publications

California Case Summaries Monthly™:  short summaries (one paragraph), organized by legal topic, of every new civil case published by California courts every month. This subscription is currently open for a short time. To subscribe, click here.

California Case Summaries Quarterly™: short, organized summaries of every new civil case, published by California courts every quarter, with the official case citations. This subscription is currently open for a short time. To subscribe, click here.

Annual Practice Area Case Summaries™: Early every January, we publish Annual Practice Area case summaries for the practice areas of Employment, Real Property and Torts with short, organized summaries of every new civil case in each practice area (plus additional important legal topics), with the official case citations. 

California Case Summaries Annual™: Published early every January, with short, organized summaries of every new civil case published the year before, with the official case citations.  

Join Our Email List: To get my free summaries of the 22 new civil cases published by the California Supreme Court in 2021, click here.


Mediation, Arbitration and Referee Services

I help attorneys and their clients as a mediator, arbitrator and referee at ADR Services, Inc., handling cases in the areas of business, employment, insurance bad faith, insurance coverage, legal malpractice, medical malpractice, personal injury, real property and wrongful death. I conduct Zoom hearings throughout California and also in-person services. When you need an experienced, effective neutral who knows CA law, to schedule a matter please contact my case manager at ADR services, Haward Cho, [email protected], (213) 683-1600.  
 

Stay safe and healthy.

Best regards,
Monty A. McIntyre, Esq.
California Case Summaries™
Mediator, Arbitrator & Referee
Master Lawyer Mentoring™

CA Civil Trial Attorney Since 1980
ABOTA Member Since 1995
Past President San Diego County Bar Assn., SD ABOTA Chapter
Phone: (619) 990-4312.
Email: [email protected] 

Get Your Competitive Advantage. Subscribe Today to California Case Summaries

Click Here to Subscribe Today
Close

50% Complete

Two Step

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.